Key Findings | RCIF Analysis

Key Findings

  • Targeted at rural areas: The RCIF is specifically designed to benefit rural communities with populations generally under 25,000.
  • Focus on public infrastructure and real estate: Eligible activities are primarily focused on public infrastructure, utilities, land acquisition, and construction/renovation of buildings for business use.
  • Job creation/retention requirement: All funded projects must document job creation or retention within two years of project completion.
  • Grant amounts: Grants range from $50,000 to $500,000, with a total annual program budget of $400,000.
  • Complex application process: The application process is extensive, requiring significant documentation, public hearings, and approvals.
  • Economic Advisory Council involvement: Applications are reviewed by Commerce staff and the Economic Advisory Council (EAC).
  • Matching funds requirement: While not a set percentage, local match is necessary to be competitive.
  • Environmental review: Applicants must complete an environmental scoping form to identify potential environmental impacts.
  • Detailed project planning: Applicants must provide comprehensive project descriptions, budgets, and schedules.
  • Job quality considerations: The application process evaluates not just job numbers, but also job quality, wages, and benefits.
  • Company commitment: Requires either a formal job creation agreement or a commitment letter from the assisted business.
  • Long-term focus: Evaluation includes consideration of long-term program benefits and community impacts.
  • Clawback provision: The program includes a provision for businesses to repay funds if job creation goals are not met.
  • Extensive reporting and monitoring: Requires detailed recordkeeping and allows for monitoring by government officials.
  • Lack of specific job creation requirements: The program documentation does not provide clear minimum job creation numbers or formulas, raising concerns about transparency and accountability.
  • Potential for subjective evaluation: The absence of clear job creation metrics allows for potentially inconsistent application of the program across different projects.
  • Limited public disclosure: As evidenced by the Idaho Strategic Resources press release, specific job creation numbers are not always disclosed, even when projects are funded.

©2024 Idaho Economy Analysis. All rights reserved.